All Thanks for your replies - and a special mention for the two haiku. I enjoyed them all.
I did watch it - it had something of the character of a repeat, Friko, or so I thought. Overall, though, I think there were just too many rules. It was more like an amateur boxing match than a blood sport.
Get me a front row seat, Dave! I don't want to see anyone lose; some intelligent debate might be nice.
ReplyDeleteThe bloodsport of politics... not my favorite.
ReplyDeleteIt will probably be the usual kind of debate with enough hot air to float a temporary balloon.
ReplyDeletehow many will do the wise thing and go outside for a nice walk, bike ride, or even just sit on a bench and watch the world go by? steven
ReplyDeleteFrail flowers appear
ReplyDeleteApril's new moon will appear
The TV is off.
I love to see how you inspire your readers.
ReplyDeletea reason for rum,
a call for whiskey sours -
candidates debate.
(are Derrick and Carl twins?)
Now you are getting a taste of American politics...so sorry for that.
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely great. Maybe the best.
ReplyDeleteIrony in a slashing flash.
I'm not sure even the winner is always a winner.
ReplyDeleteThe debate that never was
ReplyDeleteNo debate for me.
ReplyDeleteToo busy watching repeats.
Very trenchant!
ReplyDeleteAloha from Waikiki
Comfort Spiral
All
ReplyDeleteThanks for your replies - and a special mention for the two haiku. I enjoyed them all.
I did watch it - it had something of the character of a repeat, Friko, or so I thought. Overall, though, I think there were just too many rules. It was more like an amateur boxing match than a blood sport.