For Richard Dawkins aimlessness
nature's grand indifference.
Whence life's lofty valuation?
Popular Posts
-
The moon petals the sea. Rose petals the sea. Stone sea. Stone petals. Rose petals of stone. Stone rising before me. Sea moves. How moves...
-
extract from the poem Koi by John Burnside All afternoon we've wandered from the pool to alpine beds and roses ... -
Amazed at the level of interest shown in my recent images of hands and feet, though less so in the question of whether they or the face bes... -
It all depends, you see, how you go about it. And that I cannot tell you, for that will be dictated by you and by you knowing your friends... -
Hello everyone who follows David King (My Father). On behalf of the family this post is to let you know that Dad sadly passed away, peacefu...
5 comments:
Hard to be a believer…but. You present the riddle well, if I am following you correctly.
ok. i lost myself in the whirlpool.
the last line, does it ask,
where life gets such a high value
or
what life as such values in high regard?
:(
I am afraid I also am not quite smart enough to understand...but I don't really know much about Dawkins and aimlessness.
It does beg the question, doesn't it?
All
Yup, I'll have to hold my hands up to this one. The thinking was: If he is so sure that nature is blind, indifferent and uncaring, why does he regard life so highly?
Post a Comment